New Mexico Votes

Discuss issues, ideas and legislation related to the Land Of Enchantment.
Welcome to New Mexico Votes Sign in | Join | Help
in Search
Latest post 02-14-2010 11:17 AM by kralspaces. 1 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 01-01-2001 12:00 AM

    • admin
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 11-19-2008
    • Posts 43

    2010 Senate Bill 46 (Limit Increases in Residential Property Taxes)

    Introduced in the Senate on January 19, 2010

    Click here to view bill details.
  • 02-14-2010 11:17 AM In reply to

    Re: 2010 Senate Bill 46 (Limit Increases in Residential Property Taxes)

    This bill appears to address the tax lightning issue. The original intent of HB366 (2001) introduced by Rep. Ben Lujan was to cap property assessments at 3% to prevent run away property taxes on local residents from the migration of Californians in the Santa Fe and Taos areas. However, the cap did not apply to new sales of homes and created the tax lightning. When older NM folks decided to down size their homes after the kids all left, were are basically hit with the same major property tax increase as all the folks who migrated to New Mexico since 2001.

    The only thing missing from this bill is to reassessment of all property sold since 2001 back to the 2001 levels and assessed forward at the 3% cap.

    However, if the bill is not passed than the following could happen and I think that would be the best solution. Let the markets regulate the value and get the government out of the picture. Here's the TRD and DFA final comment:

     

    Consequences of legislative inaction on the residential property value issue are unclear but

    potentially significant. At a minimum the state faces significant uncertainty entering the 2010

    property tax year with numerous protests and refund claims already being filed on the grounds

    that the present law 3 percent value limitation is unconstitutional. Possible outcomes include a

    finding by higher courts that the entire section 7-36-21.2 is unconstitutional. Such an outcome

    would appear to require that assessors bring all properties to current and correct, increasing

    values for more than half of the property owners in the state.

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)